John McCain on Education (continued)
College Funding and Affordability
While McCain believes the federal government plays an important role in college funding, he also believes grants and loans should be targeted towards those with genuine need, according to Holtz-Eakin. “Moreover, it is imperative that the federal government be good stewards of this money, operating programs without waste, favoritism or loss of integrity,” Holtz-Eakin says.
Universal Preschool
Holtz-Eakin says it's clear that too many children aren't prepared for school when they arrive on the first day. “These children start school at a disadvantage and slip further and further behind with every passing year,” he says. “Research has shown that the best return on investment of our education dollar is in early childhood development.” McCain plans to better prepare American kids for school by reforming Head Start “into a program that serves the essential need of America’s children to be prepared to learn when they enter school,” says Holtz-Eakin.
McCain says that American education “must be worthy of the promise we make to our children and ourselves—the freedom and opportunity to chase our dreams.” Whether voters line up behind McCain's dream remains to be seen. Ultimately, voters will be the ones determining the path of American education in the 21st century.
Want more information? Check out our coverage of the presidential race:
Election Fever 2008: A Roundup of the Issues
What do you think about the Presidential candidates' plans for education? Share your views in our online forum.
Take Action
- this article with friends and family.
- Have a question about Choosing a School? Ask it here.
- Publish your work on education.com.
Comments from readers
Pledge of Allegiance...with GOD involved, Prayer in school...all very great things that are being removed from our society. But I guess my bias is showing. Not sure sometimes why I spent 20 years of my life protecting the rights of this "other" group and then turn around and put myself right in the middle of it again as a civilian. Maybe it's because I still love my country and will protect her til I die. Go John go! Make a change but keep us strong. I still think Romney would be a good VP.
thanks for listening to me and i hope you guys will actually research NCLB because its important to know all of the cold hard facts about NCLB and how its actually leaving students behind instead of making sure no students are getting left behind
The "general public" has no idea of what teachers must tolerate in their classrooms: excessive (government required) paperwork which must be completed during the school day--this eliminates "instruction time" from the students (most teachers do not have a helper in their classroom either); Special Education students are now required to be taught within the confines of the "normal" education classroom--while this primarily benefts the "special needs student"; it can be detrimental to the "normal" student particularly when the "special needs student" is an "EBD" student (Emotional Behavior Disorder). An "EBD" student is afforded the same "protection" (by the government) as a "special needs student" who has "genuine" academic challenges such as IQ, slow learner, dyslexia, processing problems, etc). Quite often an "EBD" labelled student is a product of very, poor parenting skills. Frequently, these children exhibit very disruptive behavior (i.e., temper tantrums--screaming & throwing things), argumentative, refusal to do classwork & homework assignments, refusal to work in a student group, will threaten the teacher or other students with bodily harm (often succeeds in doing so), and cursing or other bad language). This too robs other students of teacher "instructional time". The teacher must stop instruction, and fill-out a discipline referral before sending the student to the "Principal's Office".
"Special Education Students", by law, cannot be suspended from school more than 10 days within the school year--this includes those children who are labelled as "Emotional Behavior Disorder". For the most part, our schools are not able to discipline students--and believe me--the students are aware of this! The student has no "fear" of the school's Principal, nor of their parents.
Children tend to be "coddled" in this country; many children are not required to suffer the "consequences" of their poor decisions, as parent's tend to "bail them out". Hence, we are raising a generation of irresponsible individuals.
Furthermore, since the "MINORITY" has achieved the removal of God from the public school system, there appears to be no "moral compass" governing the student population. I would bet that if the "ten commandments" was prominently posted in every school classroom, cafeteria, and Principal's office for all to see--no matter which way you turned--you would see the culture of that school change dramatically (with students, as well as the faculty). The laws of this country were based on the "ten commandments" (lest we forget); so what would be the problem in achieving this? I don't see how any religious faith could argue the merits of the "Ten Commandments".
Education in this country is viewed as a "right" and not a "priviledge". While other countries' cultures view it as a "priviledge" and not a "right"--could this possibly have something to do with our current "poor academic standing" in the world? I truly believe that the majority of our country takes our education system "for granted".
Personally, I do not believe education should be viewed as a "right" (even though my property taxes support schools); EDUCATION IS A "PRIVILEDGE" (afforded by our country). If individuals (parents & students) choose to "abuse this priviledge", it should be taken from them.
EDUCATION SHOULD BE THIS COUNTRY'S NUMBER ONE PRIORTIY, AND ACCOUNTABILITY SHOULD BE SHARED EQUALLY BY PARENTS, AS WELL AS OUR TEACHERS!
Our culture/society is OVERLY TOLERANT OF BAD BEHAVIOR! Our schools are suffering from this--our society is suffering from this. Our teachers are not "at fault" for our society's norms and poor parenting skills.
NO DENTIST LEFT BEHIND:
My dentist is great! He sends me reminders so I don't forget checkups. He uses the latest techniques based on research. He never hurts me, and I've got all my teeth.
When I ran into him the other day, I was eager to see if he'd heard about the new state program. I knew he'd think it was great.
"Did you hear about the new state program to measure effectiveness of dentists with their young patients?" I said. " No," he said. He didn't seem too thrilled. "How will they do that?" "It's quite simple," I said. "They will just count the number of cavities each patient has at age 10, 14, and 18 and average that to determine a dentist's rating. Dentists will be rated as excellent, good, average, below average, and unsatisfactory. That way parents will know which are the best dentists. The plan will also encourage the less effective dentists to get better," I said. "Poor dentists who don't improve could lose their licenses to practice." "That's terrible," he said. "What? That's not a good attitude," I said. "Don't you think we should try to
improve children's dental health in this state?" "Sure I do," he said, "but that's not a fair way to determine who is practicing
good dentistry." "Why not?" I said. "It makes perfect sense to me."
"Well, it's so obvious," he said. "Don't you see that dentists don't all work with the same clientele, and that much depends on things we can't control? For example, I work in a rural area with a high percentage of patients from deprived homes, while some of my colleagues work in upper middle-class neighborhoods. Many of the parents I work with don't bring their children to see me until there is some kind of problem, and I don't get to do much preventive work. Also many of the parents I serve let their kids eat way too
much candy from an early age, unlike more educated parents who understand the relationship between sugar and decay. To top it all off, so many of my clients have well water, which is untreated and has no fluoride in it. Do you have any idea how much difference early use of fluoride can make?"
"It sounds like you're making excuses," I said. "I can't believe that you, my dentist, would be so defensive. After all, you do a great job, and you needn't fear a little accountability."
"I am not being defensive!" he said. "My best patients are as good as anyone's, my work is as good as anyone's, but my average cavity count is going to be higher than a lot of other dentists because I chose to work where I am needed most." "Don't' get touchy," I said.
"Touchy?" he said. His face had turned red, and from the way he was clenching and unclenching his jaws, I was afraid he was going to damage his teeth. "Try furious! In a system like this, I will end up being rated average, below average, or worse. The few educated patients I have who see these ratings may believe this so-called rating is an actual measure of my ability and proficiency as a dentist. They may leave me, and I'll be left with only the most needy patients. And my cavity average score will get even worse. On top of
that, how will I attract good dental hygienists and other excellent dentists to my practice if it is labeled below average?"
"I think you are overreacting," I said. "'Complaining, excuse-making and stonewalling won't improve dental health'...I am quoting from a leadingmember of the DOC," I noted.
"What's the DOC?" he asked. "It's the Dental Oversight Committee," I said, "a group made up of mostly lay persons to make sure dentistry in this state gets improved." "Spare me," he said, "I can't believe this. Reasonable people won't buy it," he said hopefully.
The program sounded reasonable to me, so I asked, "How else would you measure good dentistry?"
"Come watch me work," he said. "Observe my processes."
"That's too complicated, expensive and time-consuming," I said. "Cavities are the bottom line, and you can't argue with the bottom line. It's an absolute measure."
"That's what I'm afraid my parents and prospective patients will think. This can't be happening," he said despairingly. "Now, now," I said, "don't despair. The state will help you some." "How?" he asked. "If you receive a poor rating, they'll send a dentist from a practice that
received anexcellent rating to help straighten you out," I said brightly.
"You mean," he said, "they'll send a dentist with a wealthy clientele to show me how to work on severe juvenile dental problems with which I have probably had much more experience? BIG HELP!" "There you go again," I said. "You aren't acting professionally at all." "You don't get it," he said. "Doing this would be like grading schools and
teachers on an average score made on a test of children's progress with no regard to influences outside the school, the home, the community served and stuff like that. Why would they do something so unfair to dentists? No one would ever think of doing that to schools." I just shook my head sadly, but he had brightened. "I'm going to write my representatives and senators," he said. "I'll use the school analogy. Surely they will see the point."
He walked off with that look of hope mixed with fear and suppressed anger that I, a teacher, see in the mirror so often lately.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you don't understand why educators still resent the federal NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT, this may help. If you do understand, you'll really enjoy this analogy which was forwarded by: John S. Taylor, Superintendent of Schools for
the Lancaster County, PA, School District.
-----
As a former first grade, now technology K-5 teacher, I have always taught in extremely low socio-economic schools. I have seen first graders who had never seen foil around a baked potato in the lunchroom trying to eat the potato whole, foil included. And you want to attack teachers because you feel they think it's easier to tell your child the answers. As a teacher I know that my job is to help these students become the most successful possible person they can. I have to teach them the concepts and the skills necessary to survive. For some of these children that's the most important part, survival. Basing my pay on their test scores, those children who don't know what a banana is, can't even spell their own name, have families who see them as pals or hinderances rather than a child that needs educating is ridiculous. Assuming that all teachers are poor teachers based on the few you have seen is also ridiculous. Until you've spent a day or a week in a teacher's shoes (especially a teacher in my area) you have no way of knowing exactly what sort of ridiculous notions are being had. I knew EXACTLY what I was getting into when I went into teaching. I went in to be the mom, dad, and teacher that these children need. I went in to make a difference in their lives because they may not have anyone else that cares enough. I went in to make sure they can lead a decent life in the future. I went in to make a difference.
its really how the teachers are being taught in
college. they dont know how exactly to get the
attention of us students. im a junior in high school
and there are plenty of teachers in my school who
dont know what they are teaching about... maybe
thats why so many students are dropping out and
getting their GEDs. because the teachers dont know
what to do and i blame their learning at the college level,
which could be the federal governments fault.
but thats just my opinion.
And those who want their god in schools, send them to religious schools. There is no way I am going to pay for your kids to get indoctrinated in a faith that not only do I disagree with, but that teaches kids that my kids are bad for having two moms.
Teachers need more money, schools need more participating of parents, and adding the 10 commandments is not going to do a darn thing to help kids learn!
Federal involvement means Federal interference with our ability to educate our children as we see fit. Schools provide the opportunity to learn. Education is a privilege, not a right. And, quite frankly, some children should be left behind, but not based solely upon standardized testing. Our President couldn't pass the English portion of the SAT and he believes in fuzzy math. Yet, he takes no issue with expecting more from our children than he does from himself.
Our Government relishes in making laws that don't affect the members of our Government. NCLB is one of many.
I don't believe McCain will be able to hold to his promise that more funds will not be allocated toward improving education. Although an exorbitant amount of money is wasted on "improving" American education, the need for a considerable overhaul of this system will require not a simple redistribution of funds, but also a significant increase in areas that need the most improvement (i.e. teacher retention, teacher education, assessment). If this is accomplished, then there is not a need to entertain the issue of public vouchers in the school system (which I disagree with, since this does squander funds that could actually improve schools rather than punish not so much those same schools, but the public in general).
By the way, a huge part of our success comes from our saviness of knowing how to play the data game. We focus mainly on our students that are close to moving up a level of proficiency so it improves our overall AYP and API. What happens to the students nowhere near moving up a proficiency level? They're lost, invisible, "LEFT BEHIND". Those reading this with a judgemental view of we teachers, WHAT WOULD YOU DO IF YOUR JOB PERFORMANCE WAS BASED ON A STUPID ONCE A YEAR TEST? A test that holds schools with second language learners with little or no English skills, just as accountable as those with English Only students? A test that holds students who come to school with below grade level skills, low socio economic backgrounds, a lack of motivation, little or no support from parents in regards to education, students who consistently come to school without A FREAKIN' PENCIL, just as accountable as more affluent schools? Thanks Bush, for implenting a stringent assessment based plan that you and your administration have consistently underfunded. And if McCain wins, then it's another term of NCLB. I guess it would be time to make just as much money managing a Starbucks, with better benefits.
While that is frustrating, what's more frustrating is having watched the Rep. Natl. Convention last night and seeing how big and loud the bandwagon of republicans is who DETEST public education. As a teacher I felt slapped in the face by the huge, enthusiastic reaction of the delegates to McCain's plans. We're one of a few nations that tries to provide the same K-12 education to ALL of our nation's children, regardless of the talents they bring to the table. The party showed disdain for public education and those of us who have dedicated our lives to educating every child that steps through our doors. I'm writing to show my disdain for the belief that taking money away from our public schools to support charter schools and vouchers is going to be acceptable to those students in neighborhood schools that will be further underfunded and poorly staffed by the withdrawal of financial support. Or was money going to appear magically to bring this costly plan to fruition? We're not a stupid nation... so why aren't more people asking where this funding is going to come from?
1. The testing of kids at the state level and the national level is a joke. If you could see some of the insane questions these tests ask, then you could understand why kids do so poorly.
2. In addition to terrible assessment, kids are not reading today. There are far too many distractions for them. They spend hours in chat rooms, and hours listening to their ipods.
3. American society has changed and the two family structure has decreased considerably. There is a lot of what I call parental abdication. Obama made the comment more than once "We have got to start turning off the TV." When a presidential candidate makes that an issue, then you know this society has problems.
3. Schools need massive modernization, and all of it could have been accomplished if we had spent the money on education than the fruitless war we have been engaging in for the last five years.
4. Teachers are overwhelmed with problem kids. Imagine kids coming to school from a home that does not care. They are angry and they bring their anger to school. Look at all the shootings, look at all the gangs, look at all the dropouts, and look at all the apathy.
5. Kids don't do their homework today. They have better things to do. The only kids working hard are the honors students and even they are starting to slip and act indifferently to being educated. I realize there are lots of kids working hard, but statistics show dropout rates increasing and indifference to education climbing.
6. NCLB is not the answer. You don't mandate things and then not give any monetary support to it. Holding teachers accountable is saying that teachers are not doing their job and that they need to be measured in order to determine if they are. Well, a very large percentage of teachers are doing their jobs and they are doing well despite the enormous challenges that confront them. I have seen young teachers quit teaching after 1, 2 or even 5 years because they could not take it. They burned out in short order. NCLB does not support teaching. Rather, it boxes in teaching to a test, a test that ends up measuring what some test maker in New Jersey thinks is a measure for kids in California.
7. Testing second language kids with the same test for native language speakers is a joke. Imagine going to Japan and taking a test two months after you get there in Japanese and then using the statistics of that test to show how much progress you are making in the language. What a joke. Those kids are being punished when they take a test they can not read.
There are additional reasons for not continuing to teach, and i plan to outline the state of education in an upcoming book. I believe that vouchers and choice is not the answer but just a political posture that makes some parents feel good.
I plan on voting for Obama...he has the sensitivity to know what America needs to improve education.
I learned something this month-- you know how we are compared to other countries in education? We hear so often that American students don't meet the standards of other countries-- well here is how it is. Other countries have tracks where students are placed-- like Asia--- those who are going to college ( the cream of the crop) vs those who will not. Only those college bound students are tested. Hmm... in America, everyone is tested, regular division students and special ed students. Students in say the 6th grade who have the reading ability of a 1st grader take the same test that everyong else in the 6th grade takes. Is this fair? Then the school gets blamed for not meeting AYP. Students with english as a second language are tested in that second language-- is that fair.
Teachers and schools are tired of being the whipping boy. True progress is assessed by the growth they make in the classroom within ability not by a one day test.
Does the test take into account the population of students who don't care how they test. Who just fill in the circles to get it down and not try? There are children out there who do this.
Is it fair to fail a school when a small number of kids just don't get over the hump to be considered met or exceeded?
McCain wants to keep NCLB-- but doesn't want to fund education. Policitians just can't admit that it was a well intentioned idea that just isn't based on reality.
How is it fair to test a third grade and except a certain % to meet and exceed when the progress the next year is on an entirely different third grade the next year. How is progress really there?
I urge all those in education to voice their dissatisatifaction to McCain about his choice. It's high time our teacher's education association takes a stand on this-- our voices to be heard just incase McCain wins.
Medicine-- no one should die-- Doctors must save everyone.
Someone above mentioned the dentist accountability-- good one.
To all those students making comments, you need to respect your teachers as I'm sure you had more good than bad, and instead of taking a jab the first chance you get, why don't you go back and thank one for giving their time and trying to help you make the right choices in your life!
One last note..I'm really not happy with either candidate when it comes to education. NCLB has to go and vouchers are not an answer to anything, but when choosing a president everyone should ask themselves one important question first, and that is who is going to protect us as citizens.(?) Also, who knows how to protect us.(?) That is very important considering history and I really don't think Obama has the experience or the know how. Mac knows how to keep us safe.
:)
You will win for sure!
I would vote for you it's just that I am to young.
I love you! :)
-students do not care and take education for granted
-school has turned into a popularity contest
-teachers are underpaid, so they tend to be lazy and they do not care. (Although some teachers are excellent)
-NCBL was pointless. I remember being in the eighth grade and getting so nervous about the standardized test. I always perform poorly on those tests, but I get straight A's all year.
-McCain is not the right choice for this country. Although he tries to distance himself from President Bush, he still supports most of the plans the President backs. I don't know about you guys, but I for one do not want to face another eight years under another Bush.
-Vote for Senator Obama
-Abortion is wrong, but people should not vote for McCain because he is religious and supports evangelical decisions, they should vote for the most likely candidate that will make the right decisions about the issues that truly matter, such as the failing economy and being billions of dollars in debt to foreign countries, and foreign policies.
-Make peace not war
-As for terrorism, there were no weapons of mass destruction in Saddam Hussein's possession, so Bush was wrong about that too.
-And John McCain is OLD. Imagine if he is elected president and serves for two terms. He will be EIGHTY years old for crying out loud.
-Senator Obama is the future of America. Go out and vote.
******These are all my personal opinions***********
Teachers should be praised for the contributions that they make to our society which is why I personally will be voting for Obama, a candidate that has the detailed ideas of change that this country needs. I believe a country that puts the value of entertainment above the value of education (athletes salary vs. teachers salary) is in a sad state.
Questions regarding McCain's approach:
When your main focus is to send students of a failing school to somewhere else, then what's that say about the mess you're leaving behind? Do you just bulldoze over that old school? Where do all of those troubled students go? When they're sent somewhere else, isn't it likely that school's overall grade will suffer? It needs to be understood that this will just become a carryover effect.
McCain wants to pour massive amounts of $ into virtual and online schools, however doing that will have more Costs than Benefits.
PROBLEM- Students have trouble staying engaged, especially without real forms of interaction. Attempts to watch lectures all at once could become likely. There will be much longer response with questions concerning material covered. How can you assess a student's engaged learning at those particular times of online lectures? They could easily be sidetracked by things around them or other online material.
The NCLB Act- Obama wants to reform the act so that it identifies schools in need of support rather than punish them as in McCain's case. If students aren't doing well regardless of background, McCain expects schools to be held accountable and get them quickly acclimated so that they can pass the same test as everybody else. If they can't, then thus begins the transfer? Really...that's a solution?
Teacher Pay- Obama and McCain both give the opportunity of quality teachers to get a raise based on their performance and not solely their tenure. He'll award those that are making a difference. He'll also award those that choose to work in rough areas.
As far as education issues go, it's a no-brainer that Obama is leading education to a much better place than McCain.
i like your idea keep up the good work and i hope you will win.Best wishes!
but im for you and my whole family is thanks trying to
become are president.