What
print add to favorites

What's the Future of Merit Pay for Teachers? (continued)

(based on 4 ratings)
by Johanna Sorrentino
Topics: Politics and Education, Teacher Quality and Compensation

Toledo, Ohio
The city’s teacher compensation program, called TRACS, began in 2004. Teachers apply for a 5% bonus to their salary, and are assessed based on a classroom evaluation, a writing sample, and a portfolio. They are then tasked with helping the district on special projects, such as curriculum instruction. If a TRACS teacher accepts a position at a high-needs school, they receive a 15% pay increase.

Tennessee
In 2001, Hamilton County Schools received a $7 million grant to assist nine of its lowest-performing schools. Among the reforms created with this money was a bonus plan for teachers that turned out to be such a success, it was expanded throughout the entire state of Tennessee with federal dollars. The program, called “differentiated pay,” is based on student gain on reading and math scores over the course of one year. It also includes “team bonuses” for schools that show growth on test scores, so that every certified teacher on the staff gets a pat on the back in the form of up to $2,000 bonuses for teachers and $5,000 for principles. Susan Swanson, director of urban education for the district, said test scores have gone up every year since they started the program. “The recognition is probably more important than the money for most of these folks, and it has a tremendous effect on a school when they’re showing movement and growth,” she said.

Minneapolis, Minnesota
The Q Comp program began in 2005. It is optional, but Kristie Anderson, Q Comp specialist for the state's Division for School Improvement, said 71 districts are currently using the program Every district in the state is allowed to develop its own program, but all focus on giving cash incentives for student wide gains on standardized assessments, in addition to classroom and school-wide goals. The program also gives teachers bonuses for sharing expertise with other teachers to help improve student achievement.

Every school district will be taking its own approach—borrowing ideas from successful programs, and coming up with goals based on the unique challenges their schools face. But teacher compensation in some form will most likely be an article on your local school board’s agenda this year. Merit pay, at least under this administration, is not a passing fad, but is considered an essential component of school reform.

See all 3 comments »
Rate this article:

Take Action

  • this article with friends and family.
  • Have a question about Politics and Education? Ask it here.
  • Publish your work on education.com.
3 comments

Comments from readers

  1. May 7, 2009
    Kassie says:
    As a newer teacher, I've never been in a system that used merit pay.  But, I work with teachers that have.
     
    They feel it is the worst thing for the STUDENTS because it causes a lack of collaboration amongst teachers and rather causes secrecy and competitiveness to the point that teachers don't want to talk about what's working in their classrooms.  Teachers grab from the copy machine and hide what it is their teaching that day in fear that someone else might use their winning idea.
     
    Collaboration is a big part of teaching and I don't want to see that go.
     
    BAD IDea.  There's a lot to consider and I hope Obama thinks it through thoroughly.
  2. Jul 11, 2009
    N.Jayakumar says:
    Basic problem with the teaching community is that hardly any thought is given to the aptitude, liking and inclination of the prospective teacher to the teaching job during the recruitment process. Their academic performance during their degree is given high weightage in this process in addition to the intelligence level of the candidate 'to fool the committee'. These intelligent ones, not able to garner any other rewading job has a good long life to play with the future of number of generations they 'do not teach'. And because they don't actually like this job, they will never be happy and always try to compare their monetary and other incomes with peers in other fields. Teachers who find satisfaction in helping/ be with children will not bother much about rewards. It is high time recriuters involve specialists who can read the psychology and attitude of these candidates during recuitment process.(Author has close association with teaching community)
     
    N.Jayakumar
  3. Sep 27, 2009
    eblake says:
    I'm interested to see how these merit systems incorporate the huge efforts made by many non-test-subject teachers, such as the music and art instructors who are lucky enough to work at schools that still offer such opportunities for their students.  Often, these courses are the first place academically challenged students excel.  As a music director, I've seen many students succeed in my class, enjoy the feeling of pride and achievement, and transfer the new skills for success to their other classes as well.  I spend many outside hours coaching, locating supplies for my program, fundraising, and directing rehearsals and performances.  How will that effort be reflected in a test-score or portfolio-based pay system?  
     
    N Jayakumar, I hope you are not suggesting that only those who are willing to accept low pay in return for expending huge amounts of time and emotional effort for their students should teach.  Most teachers I know don't compare their incomes with other fields; they simply are intelligent and aware enough to understand that they are underpaid for the energy and time they commit, and underappreciated by many.

Add your own comment

Have questions about this article or topic? Get answers with JustAsk.
Post Comment

Free Webinars for Parents

Join our free online seminar led by top specialists in their respective subject areas