Education.com

Girls' Versus Boys' Susceptibility to Depression (page 2)

By P.C. Broderick|P. Blewitt
Pearson Allyn Bacon Prentice Hall
Updated on Jul 20, 2010

Girls may be more subject to depression than boys not only because they face more challenges but because they often adopt a coping style, rumination, that increases the risk of depression (Nolen-Hoeksema & Girgus, 1994; Petersen et al., 1993). Rumination (Morrow & Nolen-Hoeksema, 1990) or self-focused attention (Ingram, Cruet, Johnson, & Wisnicki, 1988) may be defined as a stable, emotion-focused coping style that involves responding to problems by directing attention internally toward negative feelings and thoughts. Ruminating about problems includes both cognitive (self-focused cognitions) and affective (increased emotional reactivity) elements. Ruminative strategies may include isolating oneself to dwell on a problem, writing in a diary about how sad one feels, or talking repetitively about a negative experience with the purpose of gaining increased personal insight. In general, however, ruminative focusing on problems while in a depressed mood may actually make the depression worse.

Experimental studies have found that this type of heightened self-focus increases the duration and intensity of depressive episodes, particularly in adolescent and adult females (Greenberg & Pyszczynski, 1986; Ingram et al., 1988; Morrow & Nolen-Hoeksema, 1990), who are much more likely to exhibit this style of coping than are males (Butler & Nolen-Hoeksema, 1994). Adolescents and adults who ruminate are more likely to experience depression than those who use distraction (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 1993; Spasjevic & Alloy, 2001). Distraction as a coping style involves deliberate focusing on neutral or pleasant thoughts or engaging in activities that divert attention in more positive directions. Distraction can attenuate depressive episodes (Nolen-Hoeksema et al., 1993).

To qualify as a gender-linked preexisting risk factor, gender differences in rumination and distraction must be shown to exist prior to adolescence, before the rise in levels of depression. A study of the coping styles of fourth- and fifth-grade children revealed that girls are more likely than boys to endorse ruminative coping choices when confronted with academic, family, and peer stressors, even though at these ages girls and boys show no differences in rates of depression (Broderick, 1998). Similar to Nolen-Hoeksema’s (1987) finding that older males are more likely to dampen their stress-related negative affect, boys in this study were somewhat more likely to choose distracting or avoidant ways to handle problems than girls were. Girls, on the other hand, were prone to amplifying negative affect by providing responses to stressful situations that were both very negative (“I felt like I was going to die”) and persistent (“I’d be in a bad mood all day”). Thus, it appears that when girls at puberty begin to face increased stress, they, more than boys, are more likely to bring to the task a coping style that puts them at greater risk of experiencing depression (Broderick & Korteland, 2004).

However, gender role also influences how children and early adolescents cope with problems. A ruminative coping style is most pronounced among girls and some boys whose gender roles are stereotypically feminine. These individuals identify themselves as relatively passive and nondominant and are less likely to cope by using active problem solving or distraction. Having a ruminative coping style, or being uncomfortable with or incapable of psychological distraction, may be a particularly heavy burden for feminine-identified boys, for whom such behavior is clearly contrary to the peer group’s expectations for appropriate masculine behavior (Broderick & Korteland, 2002).

View Full Article

Add your own comment

Ask a Question

Have questions about this article or topic? Ask
Ask
150 Characters allowed

Washington Virtual Academies

Tuition-free online school for Washington students.