Organizing For School Safety

Organizing For School Safety
By D.L. Duke
Pearson Allyn Bacon Prentice Hall

The mission of the school is one key element of its organizational structure. As many of the recommendations in this book have indicated, how schools are structured helps account for their overall safety, or lack of it. Most threats to safety, of course, result from human action, but human action is influenced greatly by the nature of the organizations people inhabit. Schools may vary in terms of various aspects of organizational structure, including goals, rules, consequences for disobeying rules, roles of staff members, school size, decision making processes, and channels of communication. These characteristics help to determine what students and staff members do, or do not do, on a daily basis.

Senge (1990, pp. 17–26) observes that some organizations, like some people, are learning disabled. When organizations encourage staff members to focus only on their jobs and to disregard how their actions affect others, problems can arise. Another form of organizational learning disability derives from the tendency to focus on events rather than long-term processes. When an act of violence occurs in a school, for example, the temptation may be to zero in on the immediate cause of the act instead of trying to understand how it fits into a broader framework. Based on Senge's ideas, it can be assumed that schools do not become unsafe overnight. Schools that function as "learning organizations," to use his terminology, invest time and energy in trying to grasp the factors that cause them to be the way they are. The examination of research on school safety in this book reveals several lessons regarding the relationship between school organization and the well-being of young people.

View Full Article

Add your own comment

Ask a Question

Have questions about this article or topic? Ask
Ask
150 Characters allowed

Today on Education.com