Introduction to Calculus and the Idea of Limits
The single most important idea in calculus is the idea of limit. More than 2000 years ago, the ancient Greeks wrestled with the limit concept, and they did not succeed . It is only in the past 200 years that we have finally come up with a firm understanding of limits. Here we give a brief sketch of the essential parts of the limit notion.
Suppose that f is a function whose domain contains two neighboring intervals: f : ( a , c ) ∪ ( c , b ) → . We wish to consider the behavior of f as the variable x approaches c . If f ( x ) approaches a particular finite value ℓ as x approaches c , then we say that the function f has the limit ℓ as x approaches c . We write
The rigorous mathematical definition of limit is this:
Definition: Let a < c < b and let f be a function whose domain contains ( a , c ) ∪ ( c , b ). We say that f has limit ℓ at c , and we write lim _{x → c} f ( x ) = ℓ when this condition holds: For each > 0 there is a δ > 0 such that
∣ f ( x ) − ℓ∣ <
whenever 0 < ∣ x − c ∣ < δ .
It is important to know that there is a rigorous definition of the limit concept, and any development of mathematical theory relies in an essential way on this rigorous definition. However, in the present book we may make good use of an intuitive understanding of limit. We now develop that understanding with some carefully chosen examples.
Examples
Example 1
Define
See Fig. 2.1 . Calculate lim _{x → 1} f ( x )
Solution 1
Observe that, when x is to the left of 1 and very near to 1 then f ( x ) = 3 − x is very near to 2. Likewise, when x is to the right of 1 and very near to 1 then f ( x ) = x ^{2} + 1 is very near to 2. We conclude that
We have successfully calculated our first limit. Figure 2.1 confirms the conclusion that our calculations derived.
Example 2
Define
Calculate lim _{x → 2} g ( x ).
Solution 2
We observe that both the numerator and the denominator of the fraction defining g tend to 0 as x → 2 (i.e., as x tends to 2). Thus the question seems to be indeterminate.
However, we may factor the numerator as x ^{2} − 4 = ( x − 2)( x + 2). As long as x ≠ 2 (and these are the only x that we examine when we calculate lim _{x → 2} ), we can then divide the denominator of the expression defining g into the numerator. Thus
g ( x ) = x + 2 for x ≠ 2.
Now
The graph of the function g is shown in Fig. 2.2 . We encourage the reader to use a pocket calculator to calculate values of g for x near 2 but unequal to 2 to check the validity of our answer. For example,
x 
g ( x ) = [ x ^{2} − 4]/[x − 2] 
1.8 
3.8 
1.9 
3.9 
1.99 
3.99 
1.999 
3.999 
2.001 
4.001 
2.01 
4.01 
2.1 
4.1 
2.2 
4.2 
We see that, when x is close to 2 (but unequal to 2), then g ( x ) is close (indeed, as close as we please) to 4.
You Try It: Calculate the limit .
Math Note: It must be stressed that, when we calculate lim _{x → c} f ( x ), we do not evaluate f at c . In the last example it would have been impossible to do so. We want to determine what we anticipate f will do as x approaches c, not what value (if any) f actually takes at c . The next example illustrates this point rather dramatically.
ExampleDefine
Calculate lim _{x → 7} h ( x ).
Solution
It would be incorrect to simply plug the value 7 into the function h and thereby to conclude that the limit is 1. In fact when x is near to 7 but unequal to 7, we see that h takes the value 3. This statement is true no matter how close x is to 7. We conclude that lim _{x → 7} h ( x ) = 3.
You Try It: Calculate lim _{x → 4} [ x ^{2} − x − 12]/[ x − 4].

1
 2
Ask a Question
Have questions about this article or topic? AskRelated Questions
See More QuestionsPopular Articles
 Kindergarten Sight Words List
 First Grade Sight Words List
 10 Fun Activities for Children with Autism
 Child Development Theories
 Definitions of Social Studies
 Grammar Lesson: Complete and Simple Predicates
 Social Cognitive Theory
 Signs Your Child Might Have Asperger's Syndrome
 Theories of Learning
 How to Practice Preschool Letter and Name Writing