Scientific Method and Chemistry Help (page 3)
Introduction to Scientific Method
Long ago, the first humans stood upright, used tools, and discovered that lightning produced fire. They found that the differences between medicinal extracts and plant toxins were slim and sometimes had very different effects. Everyday life included the drying of fish and meat with salt, the concentration of liquids into dyes, and the melting of metal ores to make tools. Scientific testing was sketchy. Trial and error provided clues to how elements, compounds, atoms, gases, and the like made up the world. What worked was carried over to the next generation; what didn’t was discarded.
Aristotle (384–322 ), a student at the Greek Academy, believed that matter was composed of four elements, fire, water, air, and earth. He did not think they were pure substances, but the solid, liquid, and gaseous forms of proto hyle , or primary matter . Aristotle wrote that neither matter nor form existed alone, but in combinations of hot, moist, dry, and cold, which united to form the elements. This explanation of the world was accepted for nearly 1800 years.
The main source of learning for much of the Western world until that time came from the Greeks and Romans. The strong desire to find out how the world worked kept classic philosophers pondering the mysteries of nature. However, during the Dark Ages ( 500–1600), the growing knowledge of the time slowed quite a bit. Nomadic groups and barbarians from the cold north swept through Europe and England seeking conquest. People got busy protecting their homes and trying to stay alive.
Chemistry suddenly became very important.
Aristotle’s four-element theory along with the formation of metals became the basis of early chemistry or alchemy as it was known then. A mixture of trickery and art, alchemy promised amazing things to those who held its power.
Alchemists were divided into two groups, adepts and puffers . Adepts considered themselves the true alchemists who could only produce gold through spiritual perfection. They called their attempts the Magnum Opus or Great Work.
In order to gain more prestige in the eyes of the rulers, adepts were initiated in stages. They had to move from one holy place to another seeking new methods and becoming enlightened. In order to move up the ladder of acclaim, they had to travel to the Chartres Cathedral in France or the Cathedral of St. James of Compostela in Spain. There they could feel the vibrations of the earth and experience spiritual transformation allowing them to achieve perfection and the power to create gold.
Puffers, on the other hand, pursued riches through the technique of transmutation and leaned toward showy, seemingly magical methods. Puffers got their name through the constant use of bellows in their practices. They used different types of furnaces and the ever-present bellows along with special fuels of oil, wax, pitch, peat, and animal dung. The common thought was that the hotter the fire, the quicker the transmutation.
The alchemists’ two different paths led to widely different kinds of testing, but in the end, lots of ideas came from their efforts.
Melanosis, Leukosis, And Xanthosis
Alchemists thought color was a basic property of a metal. In their attempts to make gold, they decided that they had to first get the golden color. To do this, they performed a three-step color changing method called melanosis, leukosis , and xanthosis . These three steps in the method worked to bring a yellow-gold color to base metals of very different colors.
Melanosis, leukosis, and xanthosis alchemy procedures were performed in a device called a kerotakis . Figure 1.1 shows how a kerotakis might have looked. In the kerotakis, a metal sample like copper was placed on a screen in a tall container. Sulfur was added and the entire container heated by a small fire in the base. When the sulfur was hot, it acted on the metal. Condensing sulfur-containing sulfides settled out. A sieve, like a spaghetti strainer only flat, held back pieces of unreacted metal, while a black compound collected at the kerotakis bottom. This mixture was heated in an open container to remove any extra sulfur.
The metal blackening was the first step in the process of melanosis. It was thought that a metal’s original color was removed through this process. Since, melanosis darkened the metal’s original color, alchemists thought they had banished it.
Following the blackening stage, another compound like arsenic sulfide was added to whiten the copper. This second step was called leukosis.
The third and final color-changing step, xanthosis, called for the addition of a calcium polysulfide solution (usually made of lime, sulfur, and vinegar). Mixed with the whitened copper, the solution was heated until the metal’s surface took on a tinted, yellow color. This step gave the golden color that alchemists bragged was the newly formed gold.
Alchemists thought that heating base metals with sulfur caused the freeing of gold from a metal. They thought that when they got the golden color, they had gold. Since a lot of the rulers didn’t know any better, the newly made gold gained alchemists acceptance for a while.
Other alchemists, eager to please those in power, thought they could create gold from other base metals such as lead and zinc. Ambitious rulers, looking for ways to fund their war machines, sponsored many of these early attempts.
Alchemists became the new superstars. Those who made wild claims they couldn’t deliver, were permanently benched. Others made progress. Crystallization and distillation of solutions began to be understood and used as standard practice. Many previously unknown elements and compounds were discovered.
Alchemists often used the image of a serpent catching its own tail as a way to symbolize the unity and convertibility of the elements. Early alchemists used the signs of the planets, to which they thought the elements were connected, as symbols for metals. This is illustrated in Figure 1.2 .
Other Areas of Science
Other areas of science were advancing now, and in 1543 Nicolas Copernicus made a hypothesis based on his observations of the planets. He thought that the Earth and planets rotated through space around the Sun, not the Earth, as was commonly believed at that time.
A hypothesis is a statement or idea that describes or attempts to explain observable information.
Copernicus believed that from the Sun outwards rotated Mercury, Venus, Earth (with the moon rotating around it), Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn. This strange, new hypothesis wasn’t well accepted since everyone knew that the Sun revolved around the Earth. Even the alchemists wondered how different metals might be affected.
An experiment is a controlled testing of the properties of a substance or system through carefully recorded measurements.
In 1609, Galileo Galilei tested Copernicus’ hypothesis with a home-built telescope (there were no factories then). He took measurements and recorded data that confirmed Copernicus’ hypothesis. Galileo discovered the key to valid research, experimentation . Curious about how things worked, he recorded his observations with respect to changing factors such as time, angle in the sky, and position of the Moon, Sun, and stars. His observations and calculations led to the discovery of the four satellites of Jupiter in 1610. As a result of his experiments, Galileo is thought of as the founder of the scientific method .
Antoine Lavoisier (1743–94) insisted on accurate measurements (which we will discuss more in Chapter 2) and developed a theory of combustion. He determined that combustion results from a chemical bonding between a burning substance and a component of the air (which he named oxygen), to form something new.
A theory is the result of thorough testing and confirmation of a hypothesis. A theory predicts the outcome of new testing based on past experimental data.
Lavoisier found that liquid mercury when burned in the air became a red-orange substance with a greater mass than that of the original mercury. He also showed that the original mass of mercury could be regained when the new substance was heated.
mercury + oxygen ⇒ mercuric oxide
Along with experiments by Joseph Priestly, Lavoisier discovered that the air was composed of several different components, including nitrogen, instead of one all-purpose gas. Curious about what was in the air that added to combustion, he performed experiments with other gases. These experiments showed that nitrogen did not support combustion even though it was a component of “air.”
In experiments with water, Lavoisier found that water contains hydrogen and oxygen. He was also the first person to arrange chemicals into family groups and to try to explain why some chemicals form new compounds when mixed. Due to his experiments, Lavoisier is said to be the father of modern chemistry .
Following experimentation in many fields such as astronomy, electricity, mathematics, biology, chemistry, and medicine, data were recorded that showed how nearly everything could be studied and predicted through a series of successive observations and calculations. When the same results were repeatedly obtained by a variety of experimenters in different laboratories in various countries, a particular hypothesis or theory became a law .
A law is a hypothesis or theory that is tested time after time with the same resulting data and thought to be without exception.
John Dalton developed the law of partial pressures in 1803. Dalton, interested in the Earth’s atmosphere, recorded more than 200,000 atmospheric findings in his notebooks. These observations prompted Dalton to study gases and from the results of his experiments explained the condensation of dew and developed a table of the vapor pressures of water at different temperatures.
By extending these experiments, Dalton proved that the total pressure of a gas in a system is equal to the sum of the partial pressures of each constituent gas ( P total = P 1 + P 2 + P 3 + ...). He was also the first to publish the generalization that all gases, initially at the same temperature, expand equally as they increase in temperature.
In 1803, Dalton began to formulate his most important contribution to science, the atomic theory . While examining the nitrogen oxides and the percentage of nitrogen found in the air, he noted the interaction of nitric oxide with oxygen. He found that the reaction seemed to occur in two different proportions with the same exact ratios:
2NO + O → N 2 O 3
NO + O → NO 2
Dalton noticed that oxygen combined with nitrogen in a ratio of 1 to 1.7 and 1 to 3.4 by weight. After testing this observation many times, he proposed the law of multiple proportions , where element weights always combine in small whole number ratios. Dalton published his initial list of atomic weights and symbols in the summer of 1803, which formally gave chemistry the vocabulary (symbol names) that we have come to know and memorize.
Moreover, Dalton’s most famous work, A New System of Chemical Philosophy, Part I , enlarged the idea that no two compound fluids have the same number of particles or the same weight. Dalton relied on his experimental and mathematical hypotheses to cobble together a previously unthinkable theory. He reasoned that atoms must combine in the simplest possible configurations in order to be consistently the same. It seemed straightforward then, to use the idea of individual atoms and particles when showing various chemical reactions.
The law of partial pressures, along with laws proposed by such scientists as Robert Boyle, Jacques Charles, and Joseph Gay-Lussac increased the growing body of scientific knowledge that believed that all components of nature such as gases, pressure, and heat were interconnected. We will discuss these laws in detail in Chapter 17.
Matter is the basic material of which things are made. Chemists discover new elements and further define the amazing properties of matter every day. They keep finding creative uses for compounds unknown thirty or forty years ago.
The National Aeronautical and Space Administration (NASA), for example, is famous for applying basic science in new ways.
NASA uses the scientific method to perform applied science. They see how something behaves in space with almost no gravity, like the formation of crystals, and then look for ways that the same application can be used in ground-based experiments. By teaming with scientists in industry, NASA improves pharmaceuticals, optics, and bioengineering devices. Research applied in this way can more quickly travel from the laboratory to the individual.
At NASA, these dual-purpose science and technology brainstorms are called spinoffs . A sampling of NASA’s Science and Technology Spinoffs is provided in Table 1.1 . NASA spinoffs include computer technology, consumer/home/recreation products, environmental and resource management, industry and manufacturing, public safety, and transportation.
* Bioreactor—a cell culture device developed at NASA-Johnson Space Center that brings a new scientific tool to cancer and virus testing without risking harm to patients. The rotating bioreactor wall allows three-dimensional growth of tissues without limiting pressure points. It has been successful in culturing over 35 cell types.
* Ultrasound Skin Damage Assessment—enables immediate assessment of burn damage depth and course of treatment.
* Low Vision Enhancement System (LVES)—provides a video scene via a system of optical mirrors that project video images onto the wearer’s retinas. The headset, worn like aviators’ goggles, helps counteract the effects of macular degeneration associated with aging, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, and tunnel vision.
* Heart Rate Monitor—through the use of a thin dielectric film, this dry reusable electrode allows contact that is not affected by heat, cold, light, perspiration, or rough or oily skin. It permits precise heart rate monitoring for cardiac rehabilitation patients as well as professional athletes.
* Medical Gas Analyzer—astronaut physiological monitoring technology. When used to measure operating room anesthetic concentrations such as oxygen, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen, it ensures precise breathing environments for surgery patients.
The keys to the scientific method are curiosity and determination, observation and analysis, measurement, and conclusion. As humans, we are curious by nature. In the following chapters, you will learn how scientists satisfy their curiosity.
Practice problems for these concepts can be found at -Scientific Method Practice Test
- Kindergarten Sight Words List
- First Grade Sight Words List
- 10 Fun Activities for Children with Autism
- Signs Your Child Might Have Asperger's Syndrome
- Theories of Learning
- A Teacher's Guide to Differentiating Instruction
- Child Development Theories
- Social Cognitive Theory
- Curriculum Definition
- Why is Play Important? Social and Emotional Development, Physical Development, Creative Development