Education.com

Intelligence and Intelligence Testing for AP Psychology (page 3)

Kinds of Intelligence

Is there one underlying capacity for intelligence or do we have different, distinct ways of being intelligent? A contemporary of Alfred Binet, Charles Spearman tested a large number of people on a number of different types of mental tasks. He used factor analysis, a statistical procedure that identifies closely related clusters of factors among groups of items by determining which variables have a high degree of correlation. Because all of the mental tasks had a high degree of correlation, he concluded that one important factor, which he called g, underlies all intelligence. Because the correlation wasn't a perfect 1.0 between all pairs of factors, he also concluded the existence of the less important s, or specialized abilities. Louis Thurstone disagreed with Spearman's concept of g. Based on factor analysis of tests of college students, Thurstone identified seven distinct factors he called primary mental abilities, including inductive reasoning, word fluency, perceptual speed, verbal comprehension, spatial visualization, numerical ability, and associative memory. J. P. Guilford divided intelligence into 150 different intelligence sets.

John Horn and Raymond Cattell determined that Spearman's g should be divided into two factors of intelligences: fluid intelligence, those cognitive abilities requiring speed or rapid learning that tend to diminish with adult aging; and crystallized intelligence, learned knowledge and skills such as vocabulary that tend to increase with age.

Multiple Intelligences

Howard Gardner is one of the many critics of the g or single factor intelligence theory. Savants, individuals otherwise considered mentally retarded, have a specific exceptional skill, typically in calculating, music, or art. To Howard Gardner, this is one indication that a single factor g does not underlie all intelligence. He has proposed a theory of multiple intelligences. Three of his intelligences are measured on traditional intelligence tests: logicalmathematical, verbal-linguistic, and spatial. Five of his intelligences are not usually tested for on standardized tests: musical, bodily-kinesthetic, naturalistic, intrapersonal, and interpersonal. According to Gardner, these abilities also represent ways that people process information differently in the world, which has led to changes in how some school systems classify gifted and talented children for special programs. Peter Salovey and John Mayer labeled the ability to perceive, express, understand, and regulate emotions as emotional intelligence.

Salovey's and Mayer's emotional intelligence combines Gardner's intrapersonal and interpersonal intelligences. Salovey, Mayer, and David Caruso developed the Multifactor Emotional Intelligence Scale (MEIS) to measure emotional intelligence. The items test the test taker's ability to perceive, understand, and regulate emotions. Robert Sternberg also believes that intelligence is more than what is typically measured by traditional IQ tests, and has described three distinct types of intelligence in his triarchic theory of intelligence: analytic, creative, and practical. Analytical thinking is what is tested by traditional IQ tests and what we are asked to do in school—compare, contrast, analyze, and figure out cause and effect relationships. Creative intelligence is evidenced by adaptive reactions to novel situations, showing insight, and being able to see more than one way to solve a problem. Practical intelligence is what some people consider "street smarts." This would include the ability to read people, knowing how to put together a bake sale, or being able to get to a distant location. Whether it is labeled as emotional intelligence, interpersonal intelligence, or practical intelligence, such emotionally smart people can often succeed in careers, marriages, and parenting, where people with higher IQ scores, but less emotional intelligence, fail.

Creativity

Creativity, the ability to generate ideas and solutions that are original, novel, and useful, is not usually measured by intelligence tests. According to the threshold theory, a certain level of intelligence is necessary, but not sufficient for creative work. Although many tests of creativity have been developed, such as the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking, the Christensen-Guilford Test, the Remote Associates Test, and the Wallach and Kogan Creative Battery, they do not have high criterion-related validity.

Because tests are used to make decisions, they are criticized for their shortcomings. Although psychometricians, other psychologists, educators, and ethicists agree that intelligence tests measure the ability to take tests well, they do not agree that intelligence tests actually measure intelligence. Since results of intelligence tests correlate highly with academic achievement, they do have predictive validity.

Review questions for this study guide can be found at:

Testing and Individual Differences Review Questions for AP Psychology

View Full Article

Add your own comment

Anonymous
Welcome!
Please
Not a Member? Join now!