Capacitive Reactance Help (page 2)
Inductive reactance has its counterpart in the form of capacitive reactance . This, too, can be represented as a ray starting at the same zero point as inductive reactance but running off in the opposite direction, having negative ohmic values (Fig. 15-8). When the ray for capacitive reactance is combined with the ray for inductive reactance, a complete real-number line is the result, with ohmic values that range from the huge negative numbers, through zero, to huge positive numbers.
Fig. 15-8 . Capacitive reactance can be represented on half-line or ray. There is no limit to how large it can get negatively, but it can never be positive.
Capacitors And DC
Imagine two large parallel metal plates, as described earlier. If you connect them to a source of dc, they draw a large amount of current at first as they become electrically charged. However, as the plates reach equilibrium, this current diminishes, and when the two plates attain the same potential difference throughout, the current is zero.
If the voltage of the battery or power supply is increased, a point is eventually reached at which sparks begin to jump between them. Ultimately, if the power supply can deliver the necessary voltage, this sparking, or arcing , becomes continuous. Then the pair of plates no longer acts like a capacitor. When the voltage across a capacitor is too great, the dielectric (whatever it is) no longer functions properly. This condition is known as dielectric breakdown .
In air-dielectric and vacuum-dielectric capacitors, dielectric breakdown is a temporary affair; it does not cause permanent damage. The device operates normally when the voltage is reduced, so the arcing stops. However, in capacitors with solid dielectric such as mica, paper, or tantalum, dielectric breakdown can burn or crack the dielectric, causing the component to conduct current even when the voltage is reduced below the arcing threshold. In such instances, the component is ruined.
Capacitors And AC
Suppose that the power source connected to a capacitor is changed from dc to ac. Imagine that you can adjust the frequency of this ac from a low initial value of a few hertz up to hundreds of hertz, then to many kilohertz, and finally to many megahertz or gigahertz.
At first, the voltage between the plates follows along with the voltage of the power source as the source polarity reverses over and over. However, the set of plates has a certain amount of capacitance. The plates can charge up fast if they are small and if the space between them is large, but they can’t charge instantaneously. As you increase the frequency of the ac source, there comes a point at which the plates do not get charged up very much before the source polarity reverses. The set of plates becomes sluggish. The charge does not have time to get established with each ac cycle.
At high ac frequencies, the voltage between the plates has trouble following the current that is charging and discharging them. Just as the plates begin to get a good charge, the ac current passes its peak and starts to discharge them, pulling electrons out of the negative plate and pumping electrons into the positive plate. As the frequency is raised, the set of plates starts to act more and more like a short circuit. Eventually, if you keep on increasing the frequency, the period of the wave is much shorter than the charging-discharging time, and current flows in and out of the plates in the same way as it would flow if the plates were shorted out.
Capacitive reactance is a quantitative measure of the opposition that the set of plates offers to ac. It is measured in ohms, just like inductive reactance and just like resistance. However, by convention, it is assigned negative values rather than positive ones. Capacitive reactance, denoted X C in mathematical formulas, can vary from near zero (when the plates are huge and close together and/or the frequency is very high) to a few negative ohms to many negative kilohms or megohms.
Capacitive reactance varies with frequency. It gets larger negatively as the frequency goes down and smaller negatively as the frequency goes up. This is the opposite of what happens with inductive reactance, which gets larger (positively) as the frequency goes up. Sometimes capacitive reactance is talked about in terms of its absolute value, with the minus sign removed. Then you might say that X C increases as the frequency decreases or that X C diminishes as the frequency is raised. However, it is best if you learn to work with negative X C values from the start.
Reactance And Frequency
Capacitive reactance behaves in many ways like a mirror image of inductive reactance. In another sense, however, X C is an extension of X L into negative values—below zero—with its own peculiar set of characteristics.
If the frequency of an ac source is given in hertz as f and the capacitance of a capacitor in farads is given as C , then the capacitive reactance is
X C = −1/(2π/ fC ) = −(2π fC ) −1 ≈ −(6.2832 fC ) −1
This same formula applies if the frequency is in megahertz (MHz) and the capacitance is in microfarads (μF). Remember that if the frequency is in millions, the capacitance must be in millionths. This formula also would apply for frequencies in kilohertz (kHz) and millifarads (mF), but for some reason, you’ll almost never see millifarads used in practice. Even millifarads are large units for capacitance; components of more than 1,000 μF (which would be 1 mF) are rarely found in real-world electrical systems.
Capacitive reactance varies inversely with the frequency. This means that the function X C versus f appears as a curve when graphed, and this curve “blows up negatively” as the frequency nears zero. Capacitive reactance also varies inversely with the actual value of capacitance given a fixed frequency. The function of X C versus C also appears as a curve that “blows up negatively” as the capacitance approaches zero. The negative of X C is inversely proportional to frequency, as well as to capacitance. Relative graphs of these functions are shown in Fig. 15-9.
Reactance And Frequency Practice Problem
A capacitor has a value of 0.00100 μF at a frequency of 1.00 MHz. What is the capacitive reactance?
Use the formula and plug in the numbers. You can do this directly because the data are specified in microfarads (millionths) and in megahertz (millions):
X C = −1/(6.2832 × 1.00 × 0.00100) = −1/(0.0062832) = −159 ohms
This is rounded to three significant figures because the data are specified only to this many digits.
What will be the capacitive reactance of the preceding capacitor if the frequency decreases to zero—that is, if the power source is dc?
In this case, if you plug the numbers into the formula, you’ll get zero in the denominator. Division by zero is not defined. In reality, however, there is nothing to prevent you from connecting a dc battery to a capacitor! You might say, “The reactance is extremely large negatively and, for all practical purposes, is negative infinity.” More appropriately, you should call the capacitor an open circuit for dc.
Suppose that a capacitor has a reactance of −100 ohms at a frequency of 10.0 MHz. What is its capacitance?
In this problem you need to put the numbers in the formula and solve for the unknown C . Begin with this equation:
−100 = −(6.2832 × 10.0 × C ) −1
Dividing through by −100:
1 = (628.32 × 10.0 × C ) −1
Multiply each side of this by C:
C = (628.32 × 10.0) −1
= 6283.2 −1
This can be solved easily enough. Divide out C = 1/6283.2 on your calculator, getting C = 0.00015915. Because the frequency is given in megahertz, this capacitance comes out in microfarads, so C = 0.00015915 μF. This must be rounded to C = 0.000159 μF in this scenario. You also can say C = 159 pF (remember that 1 pF = 0.000001 μF).
The arithmetic for dealing with capacitive reactance is a little messier than that for inductive reactance for two reasons. First, you have to work with reciprocals, and therefore, the numbers sometimes get awkward. Second, you have to watch those negative signs. It’s easy to leave them out or to put them in when they should not be there. They are important when looking at reactances in the coordinate plane because the minus sign tells you that the reactance is capacitive rather than inductive.
Today on Education.com
- Coats and Car Seats: A Lethal Combination?
- Kindergarten Sight Words List
- Child Development Theories
- Signs Your Child Might Have Asperger's Syndrome
- 10 Fun Activities for Children with Autism
- Why is Play Important? Social and Emotional Development, Physical Development, Creative Development
- Social Cognitive Theory
- GED Math Practice Test 1
- The Homework Debate
- First Grade Sight Words List