print add to favorites

Study Shows the Right Preschool Leads to Later Success

(based on 5 ratings)
by Danielle Wood
Topics: Preschool, Early Years (Birth-5), Preschool, more...
Study Shows the Right Preschool Leads to Later Success

A study released by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) shows that the type of preschool a child attends at 4 years old, will affect how he or she learns at 7. The study, the largest of its type to date, followed 5,000 preschoolers in 1,800 schools across the world.

So what type of preschool is best? Larry Schweinhart, president of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, and a researcher on the study says, “Early childhood educators contribute to children’s development when they emphasize child-initiated activities, limit the use of whole-group instruction, and provide abundant materials in the classroom.”

In other words, allowing preschoolers to choose freely, for as much of the day as possible, rather than corralling them into too much circle time, is the best way to create successful first graders. Over the past few years, U.S. preschools have been moving in the exact opposite direction – towards academic programs that incorporate pre-reading and math curriculum.

Whether or not this study reverses that trend, the researchers are clear on a number of points:

Language performance at age 7 improves when:

  1. Most of the activities available to preschoolers are free choice, rather than academic – dramatic play, physical activities that allow kids to practice their gross and fine motor skills, crafts, music.
  2. Their teachers have a higher level of education.

Thinking skills at age 7 improve when:

  1. Preschoolers spend less time in whole group activities proposed by the teacher, like songs, games, group story-time, and pre-academic activities.
  2. The number and variety of equipment and materials for preschoolers to choose from increases.

In a nutshell, children become better thinkers when they’re active participants in their own learning. The tricycle may not seem like an advanced learning tool, but it develops gross motor skills. Negotiating over toys helps kids practice communication. And deciding who will play which part in the pretend post office allows them to practice planning and negotiation. What they learn in the sandbox will affect them long after they’ve outgrown their pre-K clothing. And getting them ready for grade school may be more fun than we thought.

Preschool Readiness

Preschool Readiness

See more great ideas to help prepare for preschool sponsored by

Pampers Easy Ups
See all 7 comments »
Rate this article:

Take Action

  • this article with friends and family.
  • Have a question about Preschool? Ask it here.
  • Publish your work on education.com.
7 comments

Comments from readers

  1. Nov 9, 2007
    Sharon Winter says:
    WHile it is true that play time is very important, so is exposing children to academics.  We have about 40 minutes a day set aside for academics.  We do this through large and small group settings.  The 40 minutes is divided by 3 circle times. The children love their circle time with the music and songs that teach children to listen and cooperate. We spend most of our day in play time centers such as sand, water, playdough, housekeeping etc...By the way, my preschoolers do so well in their formal education, that I am noted and well known in the community of public and private schools.  I also have a bachelors and am working on a masters in education.
  2. Dec 3, 2007
    Cheryl Goodwin says:
    I agree with Sharon Winter's comments and would like to suggest that it is really about balance.  Our preschool used to be wonderful but has really become more of a daycare type setting.  It is unfortunate.  Our older child was well prepared for kindergarten but I feel that we are doing a disservice to our younger child.
  3. Apr 26, 2008
    scottp says:
    I think Sharon's comments are the exact reason this study was done.  Most teachers rely on the circle time everyday and also think naturally that formal academics must be good for young childern.  Sharon needs to embrace the study and apply what they have found regardless of what she thinks she knows from her personal experience.  Again, that is why this study was done, to help teachers move away from their incorrect traditional thinking about group study and formal acedemics for young childern.
  4. Aug 3, 2008
    Angie says:
    One thing that this article does not point out is that the High/Scope curriculum is intended to be used with a low child to teacher ratio.  I currently teach at a child care center where we integrate the High/Scope curriculum.  And while I agree that this is the best curriculum I've ever used (I'm a teacher of 10 years with a Bachelor's degree in Education), I know that for this curriculum to be the most effective, you need to work with children in small groups.  Most child care centers cannot afford to have the small numbers recommended by this curriculum strictly for funding purposes.  And as much as this curriculum nurtures the positive skills necessary in children to promote success in the future, it also requires that teachers are knowledgable in how to stimulate those skills.  The other problem I see is that parents want instant results, and so teachers, like Sharon are inclined to use strategies that incorporate activities that look like they are promoting success in children, but are only creating a temporary picture of success and may or may not be a lasting one.  Sharon, since you are such a noted preschool teacher and so well known in the community, you should be at the forefront of always looking for ways to improve the early education sector.  You have the power to be a positive influence in the urgently needed area of shaping the nation's future.
  5. Mar 13, 2009
    I'm curious if this study also looked at the learning environment in the home as well as the preschool setting. I would think that the type of preschool a parent chooses would also be indicative of how they approach learning at home. I think Sharon's 40 minutes of academics-i.e. circle time-is not excessive if you're going by a typical 4 hour day of preschool, and would be in balance of what the article suggests.
  6. Apr 2, 2009
    Juan Carlos says:
    40 minutes is a good amount of time, spread out like Sharon uses. I also believe pre-schoolers need to develop their social skills. This is the time they need to soak up colors, letters, exercise, tangible experiences- i.e. painting, playing music...beginning to enjoy school in a fun fashion. Following suit; K- should stay K and not be forced into being like the 1st grade.
  7. May 1, 2009
    Polly Neill says:
    The IEA Preprimary study was conducted by the HighScope research diversion in coordination with coordinators in 13 other countries.  It was a cross-country evaluation and had nothing to do with HighScope's curriculum which is supported by a completely different division of the Foundation.
     
    Also, while a low child to teacher ratio is certainly desirable, there is nothing in HighScope literature that mandates a low child-adult ratio.  Most state-funded preK programs will establish a ratio.  In Michigan it is 1:8 if you are accepting state funds.  HighScope is used throughout the country and around the world.  Currently work is being done for UNICEF in some of the Caribbean countries where they do not even have an adult:child ratio.  Some classes have one "teacher" an aide and well over 40 children.

Add your own comment

Have questions about this article or topic? Get answers with JustAsk.
Post Comment

Free Webinars for Parents

Join our free online seminar led by top specialists in their respective subject areas