Education.com

The Benefits of Intergenerational Programs (page 4)

Generations United

KNOW THE FACTS…Common Misconceptions about Intergenerational Programs

Myths

Facts

You just need to bring young and old together for instant integrational magic. Preparation, planning, training are necessary to successful integrational programs and must be used to prepare young and old for the experience.
Older adults are not interested in volunteering with children and youth. 59% of Americans over age 55 currently volunteer and say retirement is a time to be active and involved in the community, to start new activities and set new goals.24
Young people admire people in the media most (athletes and entertainers). When asked to name someone they admire, 18-25 year olds are twice as likely as older Americans to name a family member, teacher or mentor.25
Only a parent can effectively teach a child values. Connectedness to another adult, such as a mentor, is highly effective in helping youth.26

Conclusion

Research shows that when the generations come together everyone benefits, children and youth, older adults and the community at large. There are clear positive outcomes for all involved. Children are exposed to their elders’ traditions and wisdom. And because of these interactions, adults are able to expand their social networks and stay physically active, which betters their health outcomes. Communities benefit when all are engaged and feel included. Intergenerational programs help to dispel age-related myths and stereotypes. They can also address societal concerns such as literacy, environmental issues, health, crime prevention, and much more. Public policies can support intergenerational programs through the promotion of
intergenerational civic engagement and encouragement of intergenerational solutions to community issues. Connecting generations through programs and public policies makes sense. Together we are stronger.


For further information, please contact:Generations United, 1331 H Street NW, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202-289-3979 • Fax: 202-289-3952 • Email: gu@gu.org

The GU website at www.gu.org contains additional information about intergenerational programs and public policy including the on-line intergenerational program directory. Revised July 2007 © Copyright 2007, Generations United.
Reprinting permissible provided Generations United is credited and no profits made


1 Generations United (2002). Young and Old Serving Together: Meeting Community Needs Through Intergenerational Partnerships. Washington DC
2 Bureau of Labor Statistics. (December 2005). Volunteering in the United States, 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
3 Independent Sector (2007). Giving and Volunteering in the United States. Washington, DC: Author.
4 Bureau of Labor Statistics.
5 Butts, Donna M. (2003). “Intergenerational Service Learning and Volunteering”. Edited by: Burlingame, Dwight F., Philanthropy Across the Generations.
7 Corporation for National and Community Service (November 2005). Youth Helping America Building Active Citizens: The Role of Social Institutions in Teen Volunteering. Washington, DC: Author.
8 Butts, Donna M.
8 US Census (2006) http://www.census.gov/Press-8Release/www/releases/archives/aging_population/006544.html
9 Princeton Survey Research Associates International. (2005). MetLife Foundation/Civic Generations New Face of Work Survey. San Francisco, CA: Civic Ventures.
10 Butts, Donna M.
11 Zedlewski, S.R. & Schaner, S.G. (May 2006). Older Adults Engaged as Volunteers, The Retirement Project Perspectives on Productive Aging. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
12 Carlson M., Seeman T., & Fried L.P. (2000). Importance of Generativity for Healthy Aging in Older Women. Aging Vol.12, No. 2, p. 132-40.
13 Princeton Survey Research Associates International.
14 Butts, Donna M.
15 Glass, T.A. (2003). Successful Aging. Brocklehurst’s Textbook of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. 6th ed. London: Harcourt Health Sciences.
16 Fried, L.P. et. al. (March 2004). A Social Model for Health Promotion for an Aging Population: Initial Evidence on the Experience Corps Model, Journal of Urban Health, Vol. 81, No.1, p. 64-78.
17 Jarrott, S. & Bruno, K. (2003). Intergenerational activities involving persons with dementia: An Observational Assessment. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, Vol. 18, No. 1, p. 31-37.
18 Teale, W.H. (2003). “Reading Aloud to Children as a Classroom Instructional Activity: Insights from Research and Practice”. In A. van Kleeck, S.A. Stahl, & E. Bauer (Eds.), On reading books to children: Parents and teachers (pp. 114-139). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19 Rebok, G.W., et al. (March 2004). Short-Term Impact of Experience Corps® Participation on Children and Schools: Results from a Pilot Randomized Trial. Journal of Urban Health Vol. 81, No. 1, p. 79-93
20 Corporation for National and Community Service (November 2005). Youth Helping America. Washington, DC: Author.
21 Rosebrook, V. (2006). Research Indicates Intergenerational Interactions Enhance Young Children’s Personal/Social Skills. In Press.
22 Tierney, J.P. & Grossman, J.B. with Resch, N. (2000). Making a Difference: An Impact Study of Big Bothers Big Sisters. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.
23 Corporation for National and Community Service (2006). Youth Volunteering and Civic Engagement Survey. Washington, DC: Author.
24 Glass, T.A., Freedman, M., Carlson, M, et. al. (2004). Experience Corps: Design of an Intergenerational Program to Boost Social Capital and Promote Health. Journal of Urban Health, Vol. 81, No. 1, p. 94-105.
25 The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (January 2007). A Portrait of "Generation Next" How Young People View Their Lives, Futures and Politics. Washington, DC: Author
26 Tierney, J.P. & Grossman, J.B. with Resch, N.

View Full Article

Add your own comment

Ask a Question

Have questions about this article or topic? Ask
Ask
150 Characters allowed

Washington Virtual Academies

Tuition-free online school for Washington students.