Education.com

Connecting Concrete and Abstract (page 2)

By J.E. Schwartz
Pearson Allyn Bacon Prentice Hall

The original connection between the physical world and abstract mathematics is important to note. Nearly all the mathematics that humans have developed have been developed in response to some actual, physical-world problem(s) that we needed to solve. The connection between abstract mathematics and the concrete, physical world in the form of applications of mathematics is also important to note. We do not typically study mathematics for its own sake (although we could, and some people like to do so). Ordinarily, the purpose for learning mathematics is to use it to solve problems. The problems we solve with a particular mathematics concept could be the same problems that originally gave rise to the mathematics in the first place. More commonly, the mathematics we learn is something we use in a vast array of new problems. The person who can successfully connect abstract mathematical ideas with new applications in real-world settings is a person who has succeeded in learning mathematics in a meaningful way. This is our goal for all learners.

There is a two-way relationship between the real world and mathematics. Educators have a very special need to understand this relationship completely. Noneducators need to have a body of mathematical knowledge that they can apply to real-world problems. Noneducators do not need to be concerned with how they have derived that body of knowledge. Their body of mathematical knowledge should be something that they can simply take as a given. Educators, on the other hand, must not only understand how to apply mathematical knowledge to real-world problems, but they must also understand how it is that mathematical knowledge can grow from real-world experiences. In other words, the pathway from the "real" world to mathematical knowledge has special significance to teachers. This pathway is where mathematics educators dwell. This pathway is the arena within which mathematics educators perform. This pathway represents mathematical pedagogical content knowledge, and it is the central focus of this text.

Ball and Bass (2000) express this unusual perspective held by teachers in this way: "Because teachers must be able to work with content for students in its growing, not finished state, they must be able to do something perverse: work backward from mature and compressed understanding of content to unpack its constituent elements" (p. 98). Much of what we examine in this text is centered on this idea of working backward from mature and compressed understanding of content. We believe that this is an important element of coming to understand mathematics in the special way needed by teachers.

Notes

2A note to math coaches and professional development coordinators: We recommend establishing an online chat room in which teachers can discuss issues that come up throughout their course of study.

View Full Article

Add your own comment

Ask a Question

Have questions about this article or topic? Ask
Ask
150 Characters allowed