Education.com

Integrated Play Groups: Using a Social-Constructivist Approach (page 3)

By L.J. Hall
Pearson Allyn Bacon Prentice Hall

In the TEACCH approach the most important priority is making social interactions enjoyable, and the best way to do this is to incorporate the interests and understanding of the participants (Mesibov et al., 2004). Highly structured groups are used with the visual supports needed to facilitate learning, such as charts, checklists, and scripts. Instead of prompting or scaffolding by educators, the group members are assisted with participation through the use of visual structure. Positive social experiences are arranged in contexts that are highly motivating to the learners with autism spectrum disorders (Mesibov et al.).

Greenspan and Wieder (2000) suggest that once a child is fully interactive and engaged with an adult, then play with one other peer should begin. Parents would act as mediators to encourage engagement and interaction. A peer who is interactive and verbal and who can model play and encourage the child with ASD is best to invite (Greenspan & Wieder). Play dates should occur three to four times per week as soon as possible.

Gutstein and Sheely recommend that when groups of peers with and without autism spectrum disorder are created, any peers or partners should share the same level of competence so that no one learner feels less capable than another. The authors state, “matching persons with equal development and then placing them together in dyads or groups to help each other learn, leads to the development of intensely powerful emotional bonds” (Gutstein & Sheely, 2002b, p. 29).

Without research outcomes it is difficult to know whether or not the detailed and well-thought-out curriculum designed by Gutstein and Sheely (2002a & b) is effective or which learners with which characteristics are most likely to benefit from the curriculum. Wolfberg suggests that groups are comprised of more capable typical peers (2003). Greenspan and Wieder agree that the play partner should be more capable but suggest starting with one peer (2000). Gustein and Sheely (2002b) suggest that peers should be at the same competence level. Which configuration for a group works best, for which skills? How does the role of a coach, mediator, or play guide differ, and which aspects do they share? It is recommended that educators look to research for evidence regarding these questions. Replications by researchers and practitioners other than the authors are necessary if the strategies are to be considered evidence based (Odom et al., 2004).

View Full Article

Add your own comment

Ask a Question

Have questions about this article or topic? Ask
Ask
150 Characters allowed

Washington Virtual Academies

Tuition-free online school for Washington students.