Education.com

Kindergarten Readiness (page 3)

By J. L. Cook|G. Cook
Pearson Allyn Bacon Prentice Hall

Children old enough for school but identified as not ready present a dilemma for educators. Is it best to redshirt, or hold back, these children and keep them in their home or in preschool for an additional year, place them in a transition class (either before kindergarten or between kindergarten and first grade), or retain them for an additional year of kindergarten? None of these options has been very successful in helping children catch up to peers who were not kept back. In fact, several studies have found that children recommended for delay, retention, or transition classes but promoted anyway (perhaps at their parents' insistence) score just as well on achievement tests as their classmates (Carlton & Winsler, 1999; Stipek, 2002).

Some educators believe we need to rethink the idea of school readiness. They argue that it is schools that must be ready, rather than placing the burden of readiness on children (Carlton & Winsler, 1999; Dockett & Perry, 2003; Stipek, 2002). These educators, drawing on Vygotsky's theory of cognitive development, say that holding back unready children deprives them of the "very culture and learning situations [they] need" (Carlton & Winsler, 1999, p. 346). Postponing school entry keeps these children in the environments that created and maintained the unreadiness in the first place. This view challenges schools to work with children's existing abilities, scaffolding their learning experiences to help them acquire the cognitive skills our culture sees as important for learning and academic achievement. Delaying children will only produce further academic problems, and may well damage both motivation and self-esteem (Rose, Medway, Cantrell, & Marus, 1983).

View Full Article

Add your own comment

Ask a Question

Have questions about this article or topic? Ask
Ask
150 Characters allowed