Why Are Laws Governing the Education of Exceptional Children Necessary?
An Exclusionary Past
It is said that a society can be judged by the way it treats those who are different. By this criterion, our educational system has a less than distinguished history. Children who are different because of race, culture, language, gender, socioeconomic status, or exceptionality have often been denied full and fair access to educational opportunities (Banks & Banks, 2004; Smith, 2004). (It’s important, however, to note that past practices were not entirely negative. Long before there was any legal requirement to do so, many children with special needs were educated by devoted teachers and parents [cf. Safford & Safford, 1996].)
Although exceptional children have always been with us, attention has not always been paid to their special needs. In the past, many children with disabilities were entirely excluded from any publicly supported program of education. Before the 1970s, many states had laws permitting public schools to deny enrollment to children with disabilities (Murdick, Gartin, & Crabtree, 2006). Local school officials had no legal obligation to grant students with disabilities the same educational access that nondisabled students enjoyed. One state law, for example, allowed schools to refuse to serve “children physically or mentally incapacitated for school work”; another state had a law stipulating that children with “bodily or mental conditions rendering attendance inadvisable” could be turned away. When these laws were contested, the nation’s courts generally supported exclusion. In a 1919 case, for example, a 13-year-old student with physical disabilities (but normal intellectual ability) was excluded from his local school because he “produces a depressing and nauseating effect upon the teachers and school children” (Smith, 2004, p. 4).
When local public schools began to accept a measure of responsibility for educating certain exceptional students, a philosophy of segregation prevailed—a philosophy that continued unchanged until recently. Including children with disabilities in regular schools and classes is a relatively recent phenomenon. Children received labels—such as mentally retarded, crippled, or emotionally disturbed—and were confined to isolated and segregated classrooms, kept apart from the other children and teachers in the regular education program. One special education teacher describes the crude facilities in which her special class operated and the sense of isolation she felt in the 1960s:
I accepted my first teaching position, a special education class in a basement room next door to the furnace. Of the 15 “educable mentally retarded” children assigned to work with me, most were simply nonreaders from poor families. One child had been banished to my room because she posed a behavior problem to her fourth-grade teacher.
My class and I were assigned a recess spot on the opposite side of the play yard, far away from the “normal” children. I was the only teacher who did not have a lunch break. I was required to eat with my “retarded” children while other teachers were permitted to leave their students. . . . Isolated from my colleagues, I closed my door and did my thing, oblivious to the larger educational circles in which I was immersed. Although it was the basement room, with all the negative perceptions that arrangement implies, I was secure in the knowledge that despite the ignominy of it all I did good things for children who were previously unloved and untaught. (Aiello, 1976, p. 14)
Children with mild learning and behavioral problems usually remained in the regular classroom but received no special help. If they did not make satisfactory academic progress, they were termed “slow learners” or simply “failures.” If their deportment in class exceeded the teacher’s tolerance for misbehavior, they were labeled “disciplinary problems” and suspended from school. Children with more severe disabilities—including many with visual, hearing, and physical or health impairments—were usually placed in segregated schools or institutions or kept at home. Gifted and talented children seldom received special attention in schools. It was assumed they could make it on their own without help.
Society’s response to exceptional children has come a long way. As our concepts of equality, freedom, and justice have expanded, children with disabilities and their families have moved from exclusion and isolation to inclusion and participation. Society no longer regards children with disabilities as beyond the responsibility of the local public schools. No longer may a child who is different from the norm be turned away from school because someone believes that he is unable to benefit from typical instruction. Recent legislation and court decisions confirm that all children with disabilities have the right to a free, appropriate program of public education in the least restrictive environment.
The provision of equitable educational opportunities to exceptional children has not come about by chance. Many laws and court cases have had important effects on public education in general and on the education of children with special needs in particular. And the process of change is never finished; legal influences on special education are not fixed or static but fluid and dynamic (Yell, 2006).
© ______ 2006, Merrill, an imprint of Pearson Education Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved. The reproduction, duplication, or distribution of this material by any means including but not limited to email and blogs is strictly prohibited without the explicit permission of the publisher.
Washington Virtual Academies
Tuition-free online school for Washington students.
- Kindergarten Sight Words List
- First Grade Sight Words List
- 10 Fun Activities for Children with Autism
- Signs Your Child Might Have Asperger's Syndrome
- Theories of Learning
- A Teacher's Guide to Differentiating Instruction
- Child Development Theories
- Social Cognitive Theory
- Curriculum Definition
- Why is Play Important? Social and Emotional Development, Physical Development, Creative Development