Education.com

Types of Testing Accommodations (page 4)

By D.S. Goh
Pearson Allyn Bacon Prentice Hall

Using Portions of a Test or Substitute Tests

Often a test or a test battery is comprised of multiple parts, each requiring a particular physical, sensory, or linguistic capability to perform. When a student's disability or English language level adversely interferes with his or her performance on a particular part of the test, that portion should be eliminated. The student should be administered only those portion(s) of the test that are not impacted by his or her disability or language barrier. For example, in testing a deaf student, the verbal scale of an intelligence test should be omitted, because the result is more likely to reflect the student's hearing impairment than his or her verbal cognitive ability. The performance scale, however, can be administered to measure nonverbal abilities, because the student has functional ability in processing visually presented information. Alternatively, it may be desirable to use a substitute test in place of the original test under consideration. For example, certain tests of cognitive abilities do not emphasize verbal responses. It is appropriate to use such a test or a test specifically designed to measure cognitive abilities of the deaf in this case. Likewise, a substitute test that does not require English language skills (e.g., a nonverbal intelligence test) can be used in assessing the cognitive abilities of students who have very limited English proficiency. However, one disadvantage of this approach is that it is often difficult to find substitute tests with adequate technical quality that are specifically designed for students with disabilities or ELLs (AERA, APA, & NCME, 1999).

Testing of Limits

Testing of limits may be used as an accommodation for diverse learners. In testing of limits, the test is first administered to the student using the standard test administration procedure. After the completion of the standard administration, the test is given again to the student with a series of help steps (e.g., providing additional cues or structure, eliminating time limits, asking probing questions) to determine whether the student can improve his or her performance with additional help (Sattler, 2001). Comparison of results between standard test administration and testing-of-limits administration often yields valuable insight regarding the student's true ability and what the student can or cannot do under different conditions. It should be noted, however, that testing-of-limits results need to be considered carefully because the second testing may reflect "learning" that occurred from the student's having had the opportunity to try the test during standard administration.

View Full Article

Add your own comment

Ask a Question

Have questions about this article or topic? Ask
Ask
150 Characters allowed