The Use of Sex Reassignment Procedures

Current treatment protocols for transsexuals place helping professionals in the unique and awkward position of being potential gatekeepers to their clients. Even in the days of increasing use of cosmetic surgery, there are no other instances in which therapists are required to sanction surgical interventions. Many transsexuals are able (with the aid of hormonal and surgical interventions) to successfully pass as their desired gender without detection. However, it is important to note that others are less successful in doing so. Either the medical procedures are too costly and painful, or their basic body morphology makes their attempt to transition more noticeable to others.

Some gender minorities advocate for a future in which a multiplicity of genders, sexes, and sexualities might be possible. Based on his extensive interviews with persons with nontraditional gender identities, Hill (1997) noted the majority preferred to identify themselves as transgendered and did not want to “reedit” their biographies or to “pass” in mainstream society. Transgender activists like Riki Anne Wilchings, Kate Bornstein, Pat Califa, and Holly Devor advocate that transsexual persons “come out” and identify themselves as transgendered and, in so doing, “begin to write e into the discourses which have been written [about them] (Stone, 1991, p. 299). As Feinberg (1998) stated: “We are oppressed for not fitting these narrow social norms, and we are fighting back” (p. 5). Bockting (1997) observed that by affirming their identities as either transsexuals or transgendered persons, persons with nontraditional gender identities could alleviate the shame, isolation, and secrecy that often accompany attempts to pass as a desired gender.

Outside of academic circles, a growing number of young people do not believe that sex and gender are necessarily dichotomous. For example, some members of Generation X are more comfortable than previous generations with tattooing and piercing their bodies, dressing more androgynously, and labeling themselves as bisexual (Elkins & King, 2002; Herdt, 2001). Some see themselves as somewhere in the middle of the gender continuum and define themselves as neither male nor female but as “other.” Evidence of a new acceptance of sexual and gender diversity is clear in the proliferation of labels: queer, butch, dyke, androgyne, ambigendered, two spirited, bigendered, transgenderist, genderqueer, gender variant, and gender outlaw. In contrast, baby boomers whose activism required their ability to “stand up and be counted” as gay and lesbian seem more uncomfortable with using such labels when referring to themselves. Anthropologist Herdt (2001) sees this phenomenon among younger age cohorts as evidence of a future with diverse sexual cultures and gender minorities, the byproduct of which is an increasing resistance to heteronormativity.

*Now known as the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (http://www.path.org).